Contact Street Smarts
Follow-up on Mission Street crosswalk
Dear Street Smarts, Q: In your January 11th column, Jennifer Cherk presented an astute analysis of the dysfunction of the pedestrian signals on Mission Street. In response, you quote Caltrans traffic engineer Dario Senor as saying, "It is very important to understand that the flashing light is yellow, not red." As Ms. Cherk points out, there is no feedback to pedestrians. If they can't see whether the lights are even lit, how do you expect them to know they are yellow? Some will assume that when a car stops, the light has turned red. The main function of these odd, ineffectual lights is to confuse out-of-town motorists and to give pedestrians a false sense of security. They encourage children to start across the street against traffic, rather than to walk to another intersection or to wait for a gap and scurry across. Why not convert these expensive rigs into standard red, yellow and green systems that would signal when cars should slow and stop, and when pedestrians can safely walk? Stephan Bianchi, Santa Cruz A: The crosswalk lights aren’t meant to give pedestrians feedback; rather, they are to alert motorists that a pedestrian may be in the crosswalk, according to Caltrans. “They are warning lights only and vehicles are not required to stop, regardless of whether the lights are off or on,” said Susana Cruz, public information officer. “When pedestrians are crossing at these locations, they must take responsibility for each lane of traffic being clear, and not trust the light to provide a safe crossing. The fact that no feedback is provided, is by design.” If a pedestrian does not feel safe crossing at this crosswalk, he or she should cross at nearby signalized intersections, in which vehicles must stop at the red light, Cruz said. As for having red lights guard the crosswalk, “due to the spacing, and for capacity reasons, these warning lights could not be converted into standard red, yellow, and green signals,” she said, while noting that standard spacing for traffic signals is a minimum of 1000 feet. “If vehicles were required to stop at all of these intersections it would greatly decrease the capacity of Route 1.” Cruz went on to say that “these crossing locations and the warning systems were requested, and are fully supported by, the City of Santa Cruz.” Modifications or removal of the lights would require the city’s support, she said.
This entry was posted in Caltrans, crosswalks, driver education, Highway 1, Mission Street, pedestrian safety, pedestrians, traffic, traffic hazards, Uncategorized and tagged Caltrans, crosswalk, driver education, Mission Street, pedestrian safety, pedestrians, traffic, traffic hazard, traffic hazards, traffic signals. Bookmark the permalink.