Metering lights along Hwy 1, paving on Graham Hill needed, say readers

Dear Street Smarts,

Q: Has a study ever been done on the advantages of having ‘on-ramp metering traffic lights’ installed on some of the ramps coming onto to Highway 1? These are so beneficial to many congested cities throughout California; however, our county seems to be the only one in California with no common sense about how this could solve one of the biggest problems with commute congestion. Sooooo frustrating that those coming onto Highway 1 altogether forces everyone to brake to allow them in. Metering each car one-by-one would help at all the major on-ramps: Morrissey, Soquel, Bay/Porter, Park, State Park, etc.

Melanie Martin, via email

A: Yes, the idea of installing metering lights along Highway 1 has been studied, according to Caltrans.

“A Ramp Metering and Auxiliary Lanes alternative was studied as part of the environmental review of high occupancy vehicle-Lanes for the corridor,” said Susana Cruz, spokesperson for the state transportation agency. “The draft environmental document will be publicly circulated for review in early 2014. Unfortunately, funding is not available for either of those alternatives. Consideration will be given to an auxiliary lane between Soquel and 41st Avenue.

“Ramp metering is a bit more complicated than just putting up a on-ramp meter light at the end of the ramp,” Cruz explained. “Most of the ramps would need to be widened to accommodate waiting vehicles, and avoid backups onto local streets; and, in general, most interchanges would need major modifications to meet current design standards.”

Q: Are they going to repave Graham Hill Road after all the PG&E ‘destruction’ of the road? We have put up with months of lanes closures, steel plates and now uneven road surface. To say it’s a mess is a gross understatement! Can’t wait till the rains create our own version of sink holes, swallowing cars in one gulp. Any hope for this situation?

Sue Gawlick, Santa Cruz

A: “PG&E recently replaced portions of the gas main and service connections on Graham Hill Road,” said Joel Lacagnin, senior civil engineer for county public works. “The work included repaving portions of roadway as directed by the county.”

This June, the company will slurry seal the entire width of Graham Hill Road throughout the project limits followed by new pavement striping, he said. That will take a couple days.

“The slurry seal will extend the life of the new pavement and will give the road a uniform surface,” said Lacagnin. “We appreciate the patience of those who use Graham Hill Road while PG&E finishes this important gas service project.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
Posted in congestion, Highway 1, highways, merging, metering lights, public works, road conditions, road construction, road work, roads, Santa Cruz, traffic, transportation, transportation projects, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | View Comments

Start Smart teen driver safety course June 13

The CHP’s next installment of the Start Smart program is 6:30 p.m. Thursday, June 13 in the Santa Cruz Police Department Community Room at 155 Center St.

The course teaches newly licensed teenage drivers the responsibilities that come with the privilege of driving.

Open to teens and their families, the class aims to reduce the number of teenage injuries and deaths resulting from traffic collisions, which are the leading cause of death for 15-to 20-year-olds.

The course covers California traffic laws, defensive driving, peer pressure, DUI awareness, the dynamics of traffic collisions and the ways poor choices can affect the lives of many.

The class is free. For information and to RSVP, call 662-0511.

 

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
Posted in Aptos, cell phones, children, CHP, consumer affairs, distracted drivers, driver education, Driver safety, DUI, Santa Cruz, teen drivers, teens, texting, transportation, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | View Comments

Reader seeks school zone patrols by law enforcement

Dear Street Smarts,

Q: I would like to know the protocol in having CHP presence at my children’s elementary school during the commute hours in the morning? Almost every week this school year there, is a CHP motorcycle unit in front of Soquel Elementary School. In addition, there has also been a CHP patrol car on Old San Jose Road at Soquel High School. I can only assume they are there looking for cars speeding over 25 miles an hour in a school zone. However I’ve rarely seen anyone pulled over during the morning commute. Drive up Old San Jose Road and there is Mountain Elementary School and it has never had a CHP presence of any kind during the morning commute. It’s a school zone with a posted speed limit of 25 miles an hour; however, the general speed is 40-45 miles an hour. Parents are honked at when they slow down taking their children to school. Why is our school not given the same police presence as the two schools, which are about 5 miles away?

Thank you kindly for your time and expertise in answering my concern.

Thanks again,

Elisa Webb, Soquel

A: Just ask and you will receive, said Officer Bradley Sadek, spokesman for Santa Cruz area CHP office.

“We have received multiple complaints regarding Soquel Elementary, from parents and crossing guards all the way up to the Principal,” he said.

By parking outside schools, the CHP’s goal is to use visibility to change driver behavior, he said. But officers often issue citations outside Soquel Elementary “for speeding, failing to yield to children in a crosswalk, failing to obey school crossing guards, distracted driving and many other violations.,” he noted.

In contrast, at Mountain Elementary, the CHP has received only one traffic complaint within the last 12 months, said Sadek. However, officers “regularly patrol Soquel-San Jose Road and the area near Mountain Elementary during school commute hours,” he added. “We will continue to focus on the traffic complaints we have received near Soquel Elementary and Mountain Elementary.”

He encouraged people with traffic safety concerns to call the CHP at 662-0511.

Q: I spoke with a CHP motorcyclist about six months ago this and he said that they do NOT have decibel meters and therefore cannot enforce the loudness limits. As a bicyclist, loud motorcycles are physically painful, especially when there is a group of them passing you.

Jeff Brody via email

A: “It is true, we don’t have decibel meters,” said Sadek. “ However, any exhaust noise that is excessive is enough cause for us to make an enforcement stop and examine the exhaust system for compliance with vehicle code. If we can hear it from a distance of 50 feet, at freeway speeds, with our windows rolled up, and it is still uncomfortably loud, that is enough for us to stop that motorcycle for excessive exhaust noise.

Motorcycle noise laws vary from state to state. See how California’s standards compare to other states at http://drivinglaws.aaa.com/laws/motorcycle-noise-limits/.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
Posted in children, CHP, driver education, law enforcement, motorcycle, noise, speed, Traffic Enforcement, traffic laws, traffic safety, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | View Comments

First of its kind distracted driving study released

Texting and dialing are the most dangerous part of cellphone use while driving, according to a new study released last month by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

This, because drivers must take their eyes away from the road while they dial, search, text, etc.

Called, “The Impact of Hand-Held And Hands-Free Cell Phone Use on Driving
Performance and Safety-Critical Event Risk,”
the study also found that interface hands free devices that link drivers’ cell phones through their vehicles, as well as those portable devices such as Bluetooth, still require or allow motorists to use their phone hand held in some capacity, such as scanning and dialing.

The study took place during the course of an average 31 days between February and November 2011 with 204 participating drivers.

During the study, 14,754 calls and 8,610 text messages were recorded during the time the drivers were behind the wheel of their respective vehicles.

Data taken included recordings of the driver’s face, the roadway, and various kinematic data such as the vehicle speed, acceleration, range and range rate to lead vehicles, steering, and location. Participants also provided their cell phone records for analysis.

This is the first such study that combines call and text records with continuous naturalistic driving data.

Meanwhile, the nation’s transportation czar has asked car makers to look at ways to minimize the electronic distractions inside their vehicles that require drivers to take their eyes off the wheel for more than two seconds at a time and 12 seconds total.

“Distracted driving is a deadly epidemic that has devastating consequences on our nation’s roadways,” said Ray LaHood, U.S. transportation secretary. “These guidelines recognize that today’s drivers appreciate technology, while providing automakers with a way to balance the innovation consumers want with the safety we all need. Combined with good laws, good enforcement and good education, these guidelines can save lives.”

LaHood’s recommendations ask automobile designers to limit:

  • Manual text entry for the purposes of text messaging and internet browsing;
  • Video-based entertainment and communications like video phoning or video conferencing;
  • Display of certain types of text, including text messages, web pages, social media content.

 

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
Posted in distracted drivers, NHTSA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | View Comments

The danger factor in being a road user

Dear Street Smarts,

Q: While I agree with Monday’s letter submitter that ultimately it’s people ignoring traffic laws rather than their mode of transportation, I do have issues with the writers argument: A person operating a big rig ignoring traffic laws is far more dangerous than a scofflaw operating a compact car. Just as a car is more dangerous than a bicycle if both are crashed into a storefront or group of people. As both a motor vehicle driver and bicyclist, I believe that I can see the issue from a different perspective from a motorist. By the way, there are two safety devices that have equal importance to both driving and cycling. In cycling it’s a helmet, in motor vehicles it’s a seat belt.

Jim in Scotts Valley

A: All good points. Thank you.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
Posted in Scotts Valley, Traffic collisions, traffic hazards, traffic laws, traffic safety, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | View Comments

Everyone is on the hook for following road rules, reader says

Dear Street Smarts,

Q: Frequently we see letters complaining about the behavior of specific groups of people. On May 18, one such letter complained about ‘Bicyclists ignoring laws.’ People ignore laws. People driving vehicles ignore laws. People riding motorcycles ignore laws. People riding bicycles ignore laws. People walking ignore laws. Do you see a common denominator here? It’s people, not simply a group defined by a mode or method of transportation. People in all of these categories of transportation can also be considerate and follow laws. But the issue is about people and their behavior. The issue is not about a group defined by a mode or method of transportation.

Mike Griffin, Capitola

A: Thank you.

Q: Why do law enforcement agencies, refuse to enforce the law with regards to loud motorcycles? This would never fly in Europe, which has a greater culture of motorcycling. I’ m a motorcyclist myself, and cringe at the bad behaviors than turn the non-cyclists against us. The two top annoying traits? 1) Crotchrocket-riding thrill seekers using the public roads as their personal Laguna Seca, and 2)Harley Riders who, as a matter of course, remove the stock legal mufflers in favor of loud pipes. Loud pipes do not save lives, they are aimed the wrong direction, but create much ill-will from the non-biking public.

Steve Johnson, via email

A: Local law enforcement agencies said their officers do write tickets to riders who are disobeying noise the law.

For example, in Watsonville, officers there have issued “hundreds of citations for loud amplified sound,” said Sgt. Michael Ridgway. “Vehicle code section 27007 puts the limit at 50 feet. If the sound can be heard further then that it is a violation. Watsonville has a municipal code that puts the limit at 10 feet. Most officers will not cite unless the amplified sound can be heard over 50 feet.”

In addition, officers in his department have referred more than 50 vehicles to the state smog referee for modified, or missing, smog equipment, he continued.

“These vehicles have been modified to enhance performance,” Ridgway explained. “They generally also put large loud mufflers on them. Many are labeled as gross polluters; motorcycles are included.”

Offending riders replace stock mufflers “with straight pipes making them very loud. This is in itself a violation,” he continued.

Officers are trained to identify these kinds of vehicle alterations and can refer them to the State Smog Referee.

“Until these vehicles are cleared by a referee they cannot be driven,”he said. “If found on the road without the necessary corrections made, they can be impounded.”

However, enforcing exhaust noise laws, according to Capitola Police Department Sgt. Matt Eller, can be tricky.

“The vehicle code section for modified exhaust is 27151(a), he said. “The section is rather subjective and is not applicable while the motorcycle is accelerating from a stop or going up a hill.”

 

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
Posted in motorcycle crash, motorcycle education, noise, police, traffic laws, traffic violation, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | View Comments

Motorcycle safety training course offered June 8 in Scotts Valley

Experienced riders who would like to brush up on their skills can sign up the the motorcycle safety course hosted by the Scotts Valley Police Department 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. Saturday, June 8.

Held in the Scotts Valley high School parking lot, at 555 Glenwood Drive, participants will learn a variety of riding tips from six current and former motorcycle riding police officers with more than 100 years of combined experience.

Riders will learn things like defensive driving; clutch and throttle control; controlled braking; cornering; head and eye placement; hazard avoidance and much more.

Class size is limited to 16 riders, who will leave with a new found appreciation for riding, plus a T-shirt, a certificate of completion and lunch.

Participants must have a license to ride, plus come with their own bike and gear, including gloves and helmet.

The event is sponsored by Farmers Insurance, Surf City Coffee, Bell Helmets Rock Oil, We All Ride, Heidenau Tires, Sports Design, and Krazy Wraps.

For information, visit http://motorsquad.net/.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
Posted in law enforcement, motorcycle, motorcycle education, Motorcycle Handbook, motorcycle safety, police, Scotts Valley, Scotts Valley Police, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | View Comments

Confusing signs in Soquel Village contribute to traffic snarls, says reader

Dear Street Smarts,

Q: The sign on Soquel Drive at Main Street in the Soquel Village indicates two lanes that can travel straight through the intersection of Soquel and Porter when you can only go straight through the intersection from the right hand lane. Because of this, many people line up in the left hand lane and force a merge into the right lane causing major backups in the right lane. The backups interfere with the intersection just south at Main and cause issues in front of the fire station between Main and Porter. Any body looking into this?

Chris Wolfe via email

A: The sign you speak of addresses the way traffic is supposed to flow through the intersection of Soquel at Main, said Jack Sohriakoff, senior civil engineer for county public works.

“The lane designation sign is for the westbound Soquel Drive approach to Main Street only which indicates left turns are allowed from the No. 1 through lane and right turns are allowed from the No. 2 through lane,” he said. “This sign is not intended to make any reference to the downstream left turn lane at Porter Street and only refers to the lane usage at the Main Street intersection.”

There are other signs along Soquel Drive between Main and Porter streets that provide further guidance as to where motorists should be for the direction they intend to go.

“New signage on the Soquel Drive approach was installed several months ago to help motorists become aware of the left turn only restriction in the number one lane at intersection with Porter Street and to inform them that through traffic must merge right,” Sohriakoff said.

Q: I understand the explanation; however, the signage at Main contributes to the confusion at Soquel in its effort to clear up what is happening at Main.

Thanks for your help,

Chris Wolfe via email

A: You’re welcome Chris. This area is a difficult situation. This question has appeared numerous times over the years in Street Smarts. While public works continues to look at this area and try to find a fix that works, do realize that there are drivers who know the dynamic of Soquel Village and are simply trying to get in front of the
pack.

I received an email from another reader this week regarding a totally different subject but along the lines of people not obeying the laws pertaining to the road. In essence he said, sometimes people simply do not follow the rules.

But that doesn’t mean we stop trying to find ways to get people to fall in line and make it clear what is expected of them.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
Posted in commute, congestion, county, Intersection, public works, Santa Cruz County Public Works, traffic signs, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | View Comments

Maserati recalls 7K vehicles

Maserati is recalling 7,438 certain model year 2005-08 Quattroporte, 2008 Granturismo and 2008 Alfa Romeo 8C vehicles because the tie rod assemblies may weaken and fail.

This can cause the driver to lose control of the vehicle, thus increase the risk of a crash.

The recall is to begin by the end of June. company will notify owners and dealers will replace the tie rod assemblies. Maserati’s recall number is 205.

For information, call the company at 1-877-696-2737.

Learn more about this and other recalls from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 or visit www.safercar.gov.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
Posted in NHTSA, recall, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | View Comments

Electric rental cars now available at Hertz

Folks who need a rental car that uses zero gasoline can turn to Hertz Rental, at 132 Center St. in Santa Cruz.

Ecology Action has been working with local car rental centers to add plug-in electric vehicles to their fleets. Hertz now has two for renters to choose from.

The addition of electric vehicle to car rental sites hopes to accommodate the environmentally minded, as well as those who are thinking about buying an all electric vehicle but want to try it out before taking the plunge.

The effort is part of Ecology Action’s PEV Access & Education campaign to provide access and education to local drivers. It’s funded by the Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District and sponsored by the City of Santa Cruz.

The news comes as the market for electric vehicle in the U.S. dramatically expands as drivers seeks to save money on gas and reduce their carbon emissions. In Santa Cruz, the city estimates 47 percent of the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere comes from vehicle tailpipe emissions.

To facilitate easy travel for non-polluting plug-in electric vehicles, the Monterey Bay Area has more than 50 vehicle charging stations to serve plug-in electric vehicle users.

Ecology Action is joining The Monterey Bay Electric Vehicle Alliance in hosting a free workshop that aims to help people learn more about electric vehicles and whether that genre of car can fit into their lifestyles. The workshop is 5-6:30 p.m. Thursday, June 27 at Ecology Action’s office, at 877 Cedar St., Santa Cruz.
For information, call Ecology Action at 425-5925.

Learn more about plug-in electric vehicles online at MBEVA.org.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
Posted in Ecology Action, electric vehicle, EV, fuel conservation, fuel consumption, travel, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | View Comments