Death of police officers: Getting honest about Santa Cruz’s story

Stunned mourners console each other at the vigil for two slain police officers. (Dan Coyro/Sentinel)

As the shock of Tuesday’s tragic violence settles into grief, many people are writing to the Sentinel, or posting online, messages that go something like this::

Our town has been overrun by criminals, because we’ve tolerated aberrant behaviors. This so-called tolerance has not only cost two police officers their lives, but is ruining our beautiful coastal paradise.

Oh, that it was that simple.

To start with, the awful chain of events that led to the deaths of Sgt. Loran Baker and Det. Elizabeth Butler lead back into what our reporters are finding in the disturbed and disturbing life of Jeremy Goulet, the man who killed the two detectives and who died himself in a hail of bullets shortly after.

Unlike many such individuals who commit heinous crimes, Goulet’s trail is not all that difficult to follow, but, almost inevitably, there is a sense of missed chances that would have diverted him from this fateful encounter with the two Santa Cruz police officers. Goulet’s odyssey through the criminal justice system in Portland, Ore. — ironically, another city know, and often mocked, for its “tolerance” — leaves a number of “what if” questions. Why would Oregon not have a statute that would have identified him as a sex offender? Was any attempt made to separate him from his guns? Why would he have been jailed for his threatening behavior toward law enforcement officials in that city, but then be released with seemingly little follow-up? Why did he not end up in prison?

His arrest only last Friday in Santa Cruz — he bailed out of jail — may or may not have triggered alarms that a guy with a violent past involving guns and sex offenses was on the prowl here and may have led to Tuesday’s encounter with the two detectives.

While we’ll continue to dig into Goulet’s past and his run-ins with the law, what we’ve found already is unsettling — Goulet came here not that long ago, he was again apparently acting out his deviant sexual behaviors toward women, he was angry and resentful, and he owned guns. His own father told reporters today his son was a “ticking time bomb.”

It’s certainly true that in the wrong circumstances in any town, anywhere, a deranged person bent on violence will be able to carry out his wicked revenge fantasies. And while it’s also true none of what went on before made these awful events somehow inevitable, it’s hardly a stretch to look in the rear-view mirror and see the potential for something really bad happening involving Jeremy Goulet was coming this way.

So back to the thought that Santa Cruz is a mecca of sorts for criminals and disturbed individuals.

Certainly, events of the past year or so seem to indicate just that. The horrifying murder on a public street in broad daylight of local shop owner Shannon Collins by a deranged homeless ex-con last May seemed to open a new chapter of violence and fear in Santa Cruz, the city and the county. Subsequently, more violence, including a recent downtown killling, home invasions, gang retaliations, shootings, rapes, homeless encampments and assorted other crimes and situations have set the community on an even more precarious edge. Add to that recent Sentinel coverage of a mostly unregulated needle exchange program that dovetailed with increasing community outrage over an epidemic of heroin and methamphetamine use and dealing, and there began to be a noticeable shift of public perceptions. Our well-known and sometimes relished weirdness and tolerance had turned on itself.

But the truth is that this present darkness is not something altogether new.

In the early 1970s, and proceeding grimly into the ’80s, Santa Cruz, city and county, was the scene of a series of grisly and demented mass murders; some were tied to the drug counterculture, some to what has become almost commonplace in today’s news: a breakdown in the mental health system that even then allowed dangerously ill violent predators to wreak evil on a law-abiding, but often naive, local population.

The names of some of the killers still resound in a macabre and hideous hall of shame: Edmund Kemper, Herbert Mullin, John Linley Frazier, David Carpenter (aka “The Trailside Killer”). And that’s just the most infamous ones. There were others. Santa Cruz had to live down, or outlive, a sordid reputation as the “murder capital” if not of the world, certainly of California.

My point, though, isn’t that Santa Cruz, so beautiful and so blessed in terms of geography and people, has some sort of evil curse hovering about, or that the excesses of the ’60s somehow landed here and settled in to inflict more and more misery and suffering.

But clearly, several threads run through our story that continue to weave into this latest tragedy.

One is the drug culture that took root here long ago and continues today. The Sentinel has reported ad infinitum on the epidemics of hard drugs in this community and the cost in terms of ruined lives and associated crimes. But — and here’s where the increasingly reviled “tolerance” label sticks in the craw — people are still drawn here by the availability of drugs such as heroin and meth along with the prevalent street and underground culture that has caused a strong counter reaction among citizens and neighborhood groups.

Another is that while police have been supported — and the outpouring of tributes and grief toward the two slain officers is proof — this support has historically been tempered with a wariness about too heavy a presence, which might scare away tourists, or students, or people buying expensive homes. While law enforcement in this county is committed, well-trained, even well-paid, no one who lives in Santa Cruz County would ever say there are “too many cops” or their presence is too pervasive. That’s just the way it’s been for a long time

.Santa Cruz also suffers because the county jail is just off downtown and the homeless shelters are near downtown. Since the area also attracts what seems to be a higher-than-almost-anywhere-else number of backpack-toting transients — some drawn here by the drug culture, others by the high level of services — along with people with serious mental issues, the mix has created a long-standing tension downtown and in other parts of the city.

With the violent gang subculture also mixed in, along with the prevalence of guns, the results can be volatile.

The deaths of officers Baker and Butler — senseless and horrifying as they were — will not be in vain if all of us who live in Santa Cruz County are willing to have an honest and open discussion about what is acceptable — and what is not. There’s a cost in terms of saying we don’t want to be a haven for drug dealers, street criminals and people who think by coming here they can act out some sort of demented fantasy that would not be tolerated anywhere else.

Butch Baker and Elizabeth Butler can no longer speak into the Santa Cruz story. We who remain can bring meaning to their sacrifice and honor their memories if we confront even the painful chapters and begin a new narrative.

Posted in Crime, culture, History, In the spirit, Journalism, Local news, Opinion, state news | View Comments

Dark day afternoon

It’s about 10:20 p.m. in the Sentinel newsroom, in a tragic day where events spun into a horror still difficult to fathom.

Two police officers were gunned down in the line of duty. It is the first time any Santa Cruz police officer has been killed on the job. As stark as that, the awfulness of the loss of the two officers is as sad as any local news we have had to report in my more than 25 years at the Sentinel.

The officers who died were Loran “Butch” Baker, a 28-year cop well known to Sentinel journalists who covered the city, and a fellow detective, Elizabeth Butler. Both leave behind families, friends and a grieving police department.

While more details will certainly be revealed in the days to come, our reporters have already uncovered disturbing information about the alleged killer, Jeremy Goulet, who also died today, in a shootout with police that terrified neighbors and onlookers in the Branciforte Avenue/Doyle Street area this afternoon.

In these days of the widespread use of social media, it didn’t take long to find information about the  35-year-old  Goulet, ex military, an admitted sex offender, who had had previous brushes with the law and was known to own guns. Goulet’s previous listed address was in Berkeley, and an Internet search turned up that he had been arrested in 2007 in Portland, Ore. on a weapons charge after he was accused of being a peeping tom, then, when neighbors tried to detain him, allegedly pulled out a handgun. He was convicted in 2008 in Portland of sex and weapons charges associated with that arrest.

He was arrested again only Friday on disorderly conduct charges in Santa Cruz and a co-worker at Santa Cruz coffee shop where he had been employed for a short time until he was fired Saturday had filed a police report accusing him of breaking into her house and  making inappropriate sexual advances. He bailed out of jail. Both Goulet and the co-worker lived  on the street where today’s tragedy unfolded.  The two detectives who died apparently had gone to the woman’s home on a subsequent complaint.

Our team of reporters and photographers, aided by our local news editors, will be continuing to report this story.

Among the questions we’ll be attempting to answer: what brought Jeremy Goulet here and into a fateful encounter with the two slain detectives? And after that,  what more does this unspeakable tragedy say about what is happening in Santa Cruz County,  beyond the shock and grief people are attempting to come terms with tonight?

Posted in Crime, culture, History, Journalism, Local news, Opinion | View Comments

How old is the Roman Catholic Church?

In light of the abdication of Pope Benedict XV1, here is the list of all the popes, as posted in St. Peter’s Basilica, Vatican.

  1. St. Peter (32-67)
  2. St. Linus (67-76)
  3. St. Anacletus (Cletus) (76-88)
  4. St. Clement I (88-97)
  5. St. Evaristus (97-105)
  6. St. Alexander I (105-115)
  7. St. Sixtus I (115-125) Also called Xystus I
  8. St. Telesphorus (125-136)
  9. St. Hyginus (136-140)
  10. St. Pius I (140-155)
  11. St. Anicetus (155-166)
  12. St. Soter (166-175)
  13. St. Eleutherius (175-189)
  14. St. Victor I (189-199)
  15. St. Zephyrinus (199-217)
  16. St. Callistus I (217-22) Callistus and the following three popes were opposed by St. Hippolytusantipope (217-236)
  17. St. Urban I (222-30)
  18. St. Pontain (230-35)
  19. St. Anterus (235-36)
  20. St. Fabian (236-50)
  21. St. Cornelius (251-53) Opposed by Novatianantipope (251)
  22. St. Lucius I (253-54)
  23. St. Stephen I (254-257)
  24. St. Sixtus II (257-258)
  25. St. Dionysius (260-268)
  26. St. Felix I (269-274)
  27. St. Eutychian (275-283)
  28. St. Caius (283-296) Also called Gaius
  29. St. Marcellinus (296-304)
  30. St. Marcellus I (308-309)
  31. St. Eusebius (309 or 310)
  32. St. Miltiades (311-14)
  33. St. Sylvester I (314-35)
  34. St. Marcus (336)
  35. St. Julius I (337-52)
  36. Liberius (352-66) Opposed by Felix IIantipope (355-365)
  37. St. Damasus I (366-83) Opposed by Ursicinus, antipope (366-367)
  38. St. Siricius (384-99)
  39. St. Anastasius I (399-401)
  40. St. Innocent I (401-17)
  41. St. Zosimus (417-18)
  42. St. Boniface I (418-22) Opposed by Eulalius, antipope (418-419)
  43. St. Celestine I (422-32)
  44. St. Sixtus III (432-40)
  45. St. Leo I (the Great) (440-61)
  46. St. Hilarius (461-68)
  47. St. Simplicius (468-83)
  48. St. Felix III (II) (483-92)
  49. St. Gelasius I (492-96)
  50. Anastasius II (496-98)
  51. St. Symmachus (498-514) Opposed by Laurentius, antipope (498-501)
  52. St. Hormisdas (514-23)
  53. St. John I (523-26)
  54. St. Felix IV (III) (526-30)
  55. Boniface II (530-32) Opposed by Dioscorusantipope (530)
  56. John II (533-35)
  57. St. Agapetus I (535-36) Also called Agapitus I
  58. St. Silverius (536-37)
  59. Vigilius (537-55)
  60. Pelagius I (556-61)
  61. John III (561-74)
  62. Benedict I (575-79)
  63. Pelagius II (579-90)
  64. St. Gregory I (the Great) (590-604)
  65. Sabinian (604-606)
  66. Boniface III (607)
  67. St. Boniface IV (608-15)
  68. St. Deusdedit (Adeodatus I) (615-18)
  69. Boniface V (619-25)
  70. Honorius I (625-38)
  71. Severinus (640)
  72. John IV (640-42)
  73. Theodore I (642-49)
  74. St. Martin I (649-55)
  75. St. Eugene I (655-57)
  76. St. Vitalian (657-72)
  77. Adeodatus (II) (672-76)
  78. Donus (676-78)
  79. St. Agatho (678-81)
  80. St. Leo II (682-83)
  81. St. Benedict II (684-85)
  82. John V (685-86)
  83. Conon (686-87)
  84. St. Sergius I (687-701) Opposed by Theodore and Paschal, antipopes (687)
  85. John VI (701-05)
  86. John VII (705-07)
  87. Sisinnius (708)
  88. Constantine (708-15)
  89. St. Gregory II (715-31)
  90. St. Gregory III (731-41)
  91. St. Zachary (741-52)
  92. Stephen II (752) Because he died before being consecrated, many authoritative lists omit him
  93. Stephen III (752-57)
  94. St. Paul I (757-67)
  95. Stephen IV (767-72) Opposed by Constantine II (767) and Philip (768), antipopes (767)
  96. Adrian I (772-95)
  97. St. Leo III (795-816)
  98. Stephen V (816-17)
  99. St. Paschal I (817-24)
  100. Eugene II (824-27)
  101. Valentine (827)
  102. Gregory IV (827-44)
  103. Sergius II (844-47) Opposed by John, antipope (855)
  104. St. Leo IV (847-55)
  105. Benedict III (855-58) Opposed by Anastasiusantipope (855)
  106. St. Nicholas I (the Great) (858-67)
  107. Adrian II (867-72)
  108. John VIII (872-82)
  109. Marinus I (882-84)
  110. St. Adrian III (884-85)
  111. Stephen VI (885-91)
  112. Formosus (891-96)
  113. Boniface VI (896)
  114. Stephen VII (896-97)
  115. Romanus (897)
  116. Theodore II (897)
  117. John IX (898-900)
  118. Benedict IV (900-03)
  119. Leo V (903) Opposed by Christopher, antipope (903-904)
  120. Sergius III (904-11)
  121. Anastasius III (911-13)
  122. Lando (913-14)
  123. John X (914-28)
  124. Leo VI (928)
  125. Stephen VIII (929-31)
  126. John XI (931-35)
  127. Leo VII (936-39)
  128. Stephen IX (939-42)
  129. Marinus II (942-46)
  130. Agapetus II (946-55)
  131. John XII (955-63)
  132. Leo VIII (963-64)
  133. Benedict V (964)
  134. John XIII (965-72)
  135. Benedict VI (973-74)
  136. Benedict VII (974-83) Benedict and John XIV were opposed by Boniface VIIantipope (974; 984-985)
  137. John XIV (983-84)
  138. John XV (985-96)
  139. Gregory V (996-99) Opposed by John XVIantipope (997-998)
  140. Sylvester II (999-1003)
  141. John XVII (1003)
  142. John XVIII (1003-09)
  143. Sergius IV (1009-12)
  144. Benedict VIII (1012-24) Opposed by Gregoryantipope (1012)
  145. John XIX (1024-32)
  146. Benedict IX (1032-45) He appears on this list three separate times, because he was twice deposed and restored
  147. Sylvester III (1045) Considered by some to be an antipope
  148. Benedict IX (1045)
  149. Gregory VI (1045-46)
  150. Clement II (1046-47)
  151. Benedict IX (1047-48)
  152. Damasus II (1048)
  153. St. Leo IX (1049-54)
  154. Victor II (1055-57)
  155. Stephen X (1057-58)
  156. Nicholas II (1058-61) Opposed by Benedict Xantipope (1058)
  157. Alexander II (1061-73) Opposed by Honorius IIantipope (1061-1072)
  158. St. Gregory VII (1073-85) Gregory and the following three popes were opposed by Guibert (“Clement III”)antipope (1080-1100)
  159. Blessed Victor III (1086-87)
  160. Blessed Urban II (1088-99)
  161. Paschal II (1099-1118) Opposed by Theodoric (1100), Aleric (1102) and Maginulf (“Sylvester IV”, 1105-1111), antipopes (1100)
  162. Gelasius II (1118-19) Opposed by Burdin (“Gregory VIII”)antipope (1118)
  163. Callistus II (1119-24)
  164. Honorius II (1124-30) Opposed by Celestine II, antipope (1124)
  165. Innocent II (1130-43) Opposed by Anacletus II (1130-1138) and Gregory Conti (“Victor IV”) (1138), antipopes (1138)
  166. Celestine II (1143-44)
  167. Lucius II (1144-45)
  168. Blessed Eugene III (1145-53)
  169. Anastasius IV (1153-54)
  170. Adrian IV (1154-59)
  171. Alexander III (1159-81) Opposed by Octavius (“Victor IV”) (1159-1164), Pascal III (1165-1168), Callistus III (1168-1177) and Innocent III (1178-1180), antipopes
  172. Lucius III (1181-85)
  173. Urban III (1185-87)
  174. Gregory VIII (1187)
  175. Clement III (1187-91)
  176. Celestine III (1191-98)
  177. Innocent III (1198-1216)
  178. Honorius III (1216-27)
  179. Gregory IX (1227-41)
  180. Celestine IV (1241)
  181. Innocent IV (1243-54)
  182. Alexander IV (1254-61)
  183. Urban IV (1261-64)
  184. Clement IV (1265-68)
  185. Blessed Gregory X (1271-76)
  186. Blessed Innocent V (1276)
  187. Adrian V (1276)
  188. John XXI (1276-77)
  189. Nicholas III (1277-80)
  190. Martin IV (1281-85)
  191. Honorius IV (1285-87)
  192. Nicholas IV (1288-92)
  193. St. Celestine V (1294)
  194. Boniface VIII (1294-1303)
  195. Blessed Benedict XI (1303-04)
  196. Clement V (1305-14)
  197. John XXII (1316-34) Opposed by Nicholas V, antipope (1328-1330)
  198. Benedict XII (1334-42)
  199. Clement VI (1342-52)
  200. Innocent VI (1352-62)
  201. Blessed Urban V (1362-70)
  202. Gregory XI (1370-78)
  203. Urban VI (1378-89) Opposed by Robert of Geneva (“Clement VII”)antipope (1378-1394)
  204. Boniface IX (1389-1404) Opposed by Robert of Geneva (“Clement VII”) (1378-1394), Pedro de Luna (“Benedict XIII”) (1394-1417) and Baldassare Cossa (“John XXIII”) (1400-1415),antipopes
  205. Innocent VII (1404-06) Opposed by Pedro de Luna (“Benedict XIII”) (1394-1417) and Baldassare Cossa (“John XXIII”) (1400-1415), antipopes
  206. Gregory XII (1406-15) Opposed by Pedro de Luna (“Benedict XIII”) (1394-1417), Baldassare Cossa (“John XXIII”) (1400-1415), and Pietro Philarghi (“Alexander V”) (1409-1410),antipopes
  207. Martin V (1417-31)
  208. Eugene IV (1431-47) Opposed by Amadeus of Savoy (“Felix V”)antipope (1439-1449)
  209. Nicholas V (1447-55)
  210. Callistus III (1455-58)
  211. Pius II (1458-64)
  212. Paul II (1464-71)
  213. Sixtus IV (1471-84)
  214. Innocent VIII (1484-92)
  215. Alexander VI (1492-1503)
  216. Pius III (1503)
  217. Julius II (1503-13)
  218. Leo X (1513-21)
  219. Adrian VI (1522-23)
  220. Clement VII (1523-34)
  221. Paul III (1534-49)
  222. Julius III (1550-55)
  223. Marcellus II (1555)
  224. Paul IV (1555-59)
  225. Pius IV (1559-65)
  226. St. Pius V (1566-72)
  227. Gregory XIII (1572-85)
  228. Sixtus V (1585-90)
  229. Urban VII (1590)
  230. Gregory XIV (1590-91)
  231. Innocent IX (1591)
  232. Clement VIII (1592-1605)
  233. Leo XI (1605)
  234. Paul V (1605-21)
  235. Gregory XV (1621-23)
  236. Urban VIII (1623-44)
  237. Innocent X (1644-55)
  238. Alexander VII (1655-67)
  239. Clement IX (1667-69)
  240. Clement X (1670-76)
  241. Blessed Innocent XI (1676-89)
  242. Alexander VIII (1689-91)
  243. Innocent XII (1691-1700)
  244. Clement XI (1700-21)
  245. Innocent XIII (1721-24)
  246. Benedict XIII (1724-30)
  247. Clement XII (1730-40)
  248. Benedict XIV (1740-58)
  249. Clement XIII (1758-69)
  250. Clement XIV (1769-74)
  251. Pius VI (1775-99)
  252. Pius VII (1800-23)
  253. Leo XII (1823-29)
  254. Pius VIII (1829-30)
  255. Gregory XVI (1831-46)
  256. Blessed Pius IX (1846-78)
  257. Leo XIII (1878-1903)
  258. St. Pius X (1903-14)
  259. Benedict XV (1914-22) Biographies of Benedict XV and his successors will be added at a later date
  260. Pius XI (1922-39)
  261. Pius XII (1939-58)
  262. Blessed John XXIII (1958-63)
  263. Paul VI (1963-78)
  264. John Paul I (1978)
  265. John Paul II (1978-2005)
  266. Benedict XVI (2005—)

With that list in mind, here is the Sentinel Editorial on the Pope and the succession, for Feb. 13, 2013

Pope Benedict XVI stunned the Roman Catholic church and most everyone else this week by announcing he is stepping down.

The 85-year-old pope’s declaration he no longer has the vitality to perform his duties not only was the first time in six centuries a pontiff has voluntarily stepped down, but also marks the exit of Benedict from the world and spiritual stage. The Vatican said Tuesday that after Feb. 28, when Benedict officially retires, he will no longer have any say in church affairs — specifically, the selection of a successor to lead the world’s 1 billion Catholics.

Benedict’s announcement — reportedly in the works since last April after a particularly taxing trip to Mexico and Cuba last March — was surprising because public figures rarely admit their human frailty, or put their station ahead of self interest.

The sight of an obviously diminished and ill Pope John Paul II was certainly not lost upon his successor, who will relocate to a monastery on Vatican grounds in Rome, perhaps with a new name. His eight-year papacy was always something of a transition — after the tumult of John Paul’s reign, in which global communism collapsed and church pedophilia scandals continued to erupt, the bookish Benedict seemed something of a distant figure who was expected at the outset to continue his decades-long role in the church’s extensive hierarchy as a defender of conservative Catholicism.

The former Joseph Ratzinger maintained this position, even in the face of the continuing decline and relevancy of Christianity in Western Europe. Unlike his predecessor, he made no noticeable impact on Catholic youth, nor did he pander to modern mores and values, continuing to stand upon the church’s traditions in matters of morals and spiritual development. Benedict’s advocacy of the latter was probably the impetus for the biggest intellectual furor in his papacy — his 2006 speech on “Faith and Reason” where the Pope was pilloried for quoting a 14th-century Byzantine emperor who had negative things to say about Islam. Was this Benedict’s response to the rise of Islamic fundamentalism? The Pope’s aides demurred, saying he wanted to demonstrate that faith and reason need not be in opposition. Clearly, his inference was that militant Islam threatens Western values and freedoms.

But his tenure was marred by the issue the Church cannot hide from: the sex-abuse scandals, and the cover ups in high places and almost willful negligence to root out abusive priests. While Pope Benedict somewhat belatedly recognized the need to shine a light on all the sordidness of this sorrowful chapter in the Church’s long history, his recognition seemed small consolation for past crimes.

The scandals illuminated like nothing else in recent centuries, the archaic and ill-suited administrative bureaucracy, created centuries ago for protection, has become a hindrance rather than a helper to the modern Church.

He almost certainly was aware that he was not a strong manager of people or the bureaucracy, and considering his age and increasing infirmities, this may have helped him make a decision that hopefully will result in a younger, less traditionalist leader for the world’s most enduring institution. Whether this Pope comes from the points on the globe where Catholicism is growing — Africa and Latin America most notably — or is another white European, will be decided before March 31, Easter.

That, of course, would be the inspired day for a resurrection of hope that could gather around the next person the Church designates to follow in the ancient footsteps of St. Peter.

 

Posted in culture, History, In the spirit, The world | View Comments

Dealing with drug needles

One of the confusing aspects of the intensifying local debate about providing clean needles for drug addicts in Santa Cruz is just who is overseeing the distribution.

Based on public documents, it’s clear Santa Cruz County public health officials have been supportive and aware of needle exchanges — and that the county did not properly oversee these programs.

But the city of Santa Cruz hardly comes off well, either. The city only began to act after newly elected Councilwoman Pamela Comstock, a founding board member of the group Take Back Santa Cruz, and other raised awareness. The needle exchange program was further spotlighted in a series of Sentinel special reports and Editorials in recent weeks.

In a story published last week, the Sentinel found the volunteer needle exchange in the county exchanges twice as many drug needles to addicts as a government-run program in Santa Clara County — an area with six times the population. The local needle exchange, run in recent years by Street Outreach Supporters, had been handing out free clean needles to intravenous drug users for 24 years outside a laundromat in the Lower Ocean area of Santa Cruz — until late last month when the owner of the property at Bixby and Barson streets insisted the exchange leave. That move came as the city, under increasing pressure from residents fed up with drug crime and dirty needles, notified the owner the exchange constituted an unpermitted use.

Since then, the needle exchange has sought to set up on additional days at the county health facility on Emeline Avenue, where they already distribute on Sundays. In addition, the Santa Cruz City Council will meet Tuesday to discuss recommendations that the county take over management of the exchange and work with the city to find a different location.

While there’s little argument that providing clean needles cuts down on the transmission of disease, the scope of the local program and the location remain highly controversial. Santa Cruz has been burdened by a reputation for harboring more than its share of drug addicts and transients, and some council members would like to see the exchange somewhere other than the lower Ocean Street area, a neighborhood long afflicted by drug-related crime.

And while it may be a circular argument, it makes public-health sense to provide clean needles in locations with a high population of addicts. But such a location needs to be in an area zoned for medical uses. That clearly wasn’t the case with the laundromat parking lot.

The city also needs to be above board in how it informs the public about a potential location — and not hide behind a spurious closed-to-the-public session to discuss code enforcement.

That’s what happened last month, when city officials, citing the threat of potential litigation, met out of public scrutiny about how to change the needle exchange location. Whatever the location, the county needs to step up oversight. That’s what was supposed to happen, based on a 2009 agreement where the county’s Health Service Agency gave official recognition to Street Outreach Supporters as an authorized needle exchange program. The memo of understanding between HSA and SOS stated the latter would provide documentation on the number of participants and needles exchanged to the HSA for an annual report to the county Board of Supervisors.

Such oversight either hasn’t occurred or hasn’t been effective. Meanwhile, the exchange reports turning over 240,000 needles annually to the county for safe disposal.

One major component of a county-regulated needle exchange should include one-to-one exchange; i.e. a dirty needle for a clean needle. The failure to insist on an equal exchange is one reason dirty needles have become commonplace in certain areas of the city, including beaches and parks.

The county should also require more collection boxes be placed in well-lit public spaces in areas where drug addicts congregate. This is pressing since state law allows pharmacies to sell 30 clean needles to people without a prescription or an exchange — but not all of the pharmacies take dirty needles in return or sell disposal containers. Closing down the Santa Cruz distribution also could lead to more discarded dirty needles.

Santa Clara County’s program has set up multiple exchange sites outside residential areas, while requiring membership cards, one-on-one exchanges and more disposal boxes — all the while distributing half as many needles as given out in Santa Cruz.

A county-regulated program, built on aspects of the neighboring needle exchange in Santa Clara County, would be a major step forward in showing the city and county are seriously listening to residents outraged over the proliferation of addicts and dealers. Clean needles should be exchanged to prevent the spread of disease among intravenous drug users — with the recognition that dirty needles and drug crimes are public health issues as well.

This post is the Sentinel Editorial for Feb. 10, 2013

Posted in Crime, culture, Economy, education, Environment, Health, Local news, Opinion, state news | View Comments

Taking a bite out of sharks’ dangerous predators

This September 18, 2012, photo provided to the Associated Press by OCEARCH shows scientists tagging a great white shark named Mary Lee off of the Cape Cod, Mass. coast. Mary Lee was tracked south to the Florida coast before she began swimming north again, surprising scientists who thought she'd stay in warmer Southern waters for the winter. AP Photo/OCEARCH, Mike Estabroo

Have great white sharks been outfitted with the dark hat of villainy for no good reason other than humans’ primal fears of monsters lurking beneath the deep?

Scientifically speaking, it would appear so. Because the emotional fear of an animal that can grow to 20-feet long and 4,000 pounds is so strong, it’s questionable whether most coastal residents agree with the California Fish and Game Commission’s decision to study whether the marine predator should be added to the state’s endangered species roster.

Ocean and environmental advocates have been warning for years the number of white sharks has gotten dangerously low — and, since the sharks swim atop the marine food chain, this dwindling population indicates serious issues with the ocean’s ecosystem.

Some scientists, however, say it’s too early to list great whites as endangered — the data on whether the population is declining remains murky, they say, and putting great whites on the list could make it more difficult for more extensive studies. The sharks also are being considered for the federal endangered list.

Three environmental organizations last August filed a petition with the state asking the great whites in the northeastern Pacific Ocean be declared endangered. The groups cited recent studies estimating the adult white shark population at about 350 in that stretch of water, with fewer than 100 reproductive females.

The Fish and Game Commission agreed Wednesday to initiate a one-year review of the white shark population to see if the animal qualifies for the enhanced protection. The state already has banned the hunting of great whites in waters out to three miles off the coast. In 2011 and Gov. Jerry Brown signed into law a bill banning the sale or possession of shark fins. But the laws say nothing about another threat: Sharks killed accidentally in gill net fishing

Any enhanced protections will affect Southern California gillnet fisheries, which sometimes and inadvertently snag great whites while bottom fishing for halibut. Fishing groups are unhappy about new shark protections, citing a host of state regulations making it ever more difficult to fish in waters off the state.

Shark experts have said for years it’s more dangerous to drive to the beach than jumping in the water only to end up in “Jaws” and becoming underwater food for naught. There have been 13 documented deaths-by-great white shark in California since 1952, with the most recent off a beach in Santa Barbara County Oct. 22. That’s 13 deaths in 60 years, in a state where hundreds of thousands of people swim in the Pacific Ocean on any given summer day. Worldwide, there are about 100 reported shark “encounters” every year, with about 10 fatalities.

Scientists say great whites eat seals, sea lions, dolphins and fish, along with other sharks down the chain — and humans who end up in their toothy clutches are almost certainly mistaken for marine prey.

Another recent academic study took up the “politics” of shark attacks, nothing that there’s no basis for believing sharks have a taste for human flesh. The study’s Australian author urges that people, and the bloodthirsty media, stop using “kne- jerk” descriptions of shark encounters at every sighting. The result of this bad rap is that around the world, sharks are being hunted to the brink of extinction.

Much remains unknown about great whites, even if they aren’t the fearsome killers of nightmares. Better to take the year to learn more about great whites then waiting to see if there will be any sharks left to study.

This post is the Santa Cruz Sentinel Editorial for Feb. 7, 2013
 

Posted in culture, Economy, Environment, National news, Opinion, state news | View Comments

Scourge of crime hits home

In my job, I frequently write unsigned — and windy — Editorials, decrying injustice and the need for more tolerance, rehabilitation and even redemption. More gun control.

I write about the plight of addiction, about the need to end chronic recidivism among released prisoners, about attacking scourges like gang violence with education and after-school programs, and about more services for the mentally ill, the homeless and the indigent.

But as the saying goes, “a conservative is a liberal who’s been mugged.” I didn’t say that, but I get it.

Actually, what I get is angry at the criminals, the crooks and thieves, who keep this area on edge. Keep my family on edge.

Last week, for the second time in three months, we were the subject of a break-in at our home.

The first took place in early November. Two bikes were stolen out of our garage. The thief or thieves entered through a side door that had been left temporarily unlocked. While I was out of town, others were staying at our house. We also had construction equipment blocking our driveway, so whoever stole the bikes had to actually lift them overhead to get them out the driveway.

No matter. Gone. I started scouring Craigslist, because stolen bikes often end up for sale on that popular site. I didn’t go to the other popular outlet for dealing with stolen merchandise, the Flea Market, because … I don’t know why. Maybe I just felt it was just a useless, vainglorious search.I replaced the stolen bikes and double locked the new ones and increased security around our garage.

I should note we live in a pretty nice neighborhood, with neighbors who watch out for suspicious activities and are usually quick to report anything. Usually.

Then Thursday I got a call from my wife. My daughter’s car had been broken into and a navigation device and a few other things stolen.  In broad daylight, late afternoon. The thief then moved on to another vehicle parked in the driveway of a rental on our property. Our renter was sitting in her truck finishing a phone call when the thief, obviously not seeing her, tried to get into the vehicle. She got a good look at him. He looked back at her. They both froze. Then he took off. She quickly notified my daughter, who jumped in her car and tried to give chase. Not a good idea, by the way. In any case, the thief melted into the neighborhood.

Sheriff’s deputies were called and showed up quickly. The deputy who filed our report was extremely helpful, I’m told, taking time to get the complete story of what happened, dusting for fingerprints, writing down the details of the sighting. He told the women that he really hoped this case would lead to an arrest. He also lived in the area, he said.

The next day, the Sheriff’s Office called me and followed up, letting me know that with the positive ID there might be a chance at finding the thief.

Was it the same guy, or gang, that stole our bikes a few months before? Beats me.At the same time, I know that the chances of any property crime, or break-in, leading to an arrest are pretty slim.

And despite the headlines in the Sentinel about crime — the daily report of human failings we faithfully pass along — local law enforcement says that reported burglaries, assaults, robberies and rapes in unincorporated Santa Cruz County declined in 2012 compared with the past few years.

There were 723 reported burglaries in unincorporated county areas, which was nearly 200 fewer burglaries than in 2011, according to the Sheriff’s Office. The rate of arrests per burglary also increased from 6.7 percent in 2011 to 7.9 percent in 2012. While that was an improvement, it trails the FBI’s national average of 12.7 percent of arrests per burglary in 2011.

The rate of arrest per violent crimes — such as assault and robbery — was about 39.5 percent in 2012 for the Sheriff’s Office. The national average was 47.7 percent in 2011.Of course, there are far more property crimes than violent crimes, and it’s good news whenever large-scale burglary rings are apprehended, which does happen.

One such successful ending came last August 2012, when a man and woman were arrested after allegedly breaking into numerous homes, cars and storage units to gather identity information.

And I have to admit I got more than a little satisfaction when our crime reporter came back Thursday with the news that two brazen bike thieves had been caught in Santa Cruz. Both were caught trying to steal bikes by cutting their locks.  Our county government reporter also may have been temporarily satisfied, since he’d had his bike stolen after he’d locked it at the county Government Center on Ocean Street last week. Apparently, the reading public agreed — as of Friday afternoon, our account of the arrests was the most read story in our constantly updating online list.

Look, I know for every report of a crime, there’s probably several others that never are called in. And I also know, I haven’t been as vigilant or security conscious as I should be. I’ve had cars broken into before (one time I actually reached the thief who stole my cell phone by just calling my number).

But how do we want to live and what are we willing to put up with?

Day in, day out, in my job as editor of the local newspaper, I hear from Santa Cruz County residents who have had enough of street crime, of the proliferation of drug addicts and dealers and the crime and mess they bring with them, of ever-new recruits into criminal gangs who think jail is a badge of honor.

And I think, We’re a tolerant community, but enough’s enough.

Posted in Crime, culture, education, Environment, In the spirit, Local news, Opinion | View Comments

Consequences of “helping” drug addicts with clean needles

Common sense.

That’s all it takes to realize that distributing 10,000 clean needles a month to drug addicts in Santa Cruz is going to create a whole host of problems.

Such as:

  • Discarded and dirty used needles found on beaches and trails and floating in creeks, rivers and in the ocean.
  • Addicts who, lost in their habit, show up to exchange needles then return to the streets, where they often commit crimes to support their expensive addictions.
  • Outrage from a community that, while tolerant, increasingly is demanding answers from public officials about just why the illegal drug trade, with all its associated issues, continues to flourish in the city and outlying areas.

The complaints are having an effect. Tuesday night, three members of the Santa Cruz City Council, who serve on the city’s new Public Safety Committee, recommended the council approve a stringent plan to more closely monitor needle exchange programs.The recommendations are a step forward — and came after the council had already begun moving to regulate the local needle exchange program — even if overdue. And we expect to hear a strong defense of needle exchange programs from some public health officials, who have long stressed that it’s better to ensure addicts have access to clean needles than risk outbreaks of disease from dirty syringes and a lack of drug preparation equipment.

In a Sentinel special report published Sunday, reporter Stephen Baxter detailed how Street Outreach Supporters has been distributing 10,000 clean needles a month and other drug-use equipment. The organization, which uses a Santa Cruz County-provided van, also collects thousands of dirty needles from clients. But local residents, and Santa Cruz police, say that syringes and metal “cookers” (distributed by the exchange for helping addicts prepare heroin for injection) increasingly are being found in public places.

The needle exchange is a successor to the Santa Cruz Front Street drop-in program operated until 2009 by the Santa Cruz AIDS project, which provided a host of services for HIV positive people, but also drew criticism from police who said the exchange promoted illegal drug use in the city.

As funding dried up, the drop-in center was closed. Volunteers from the Street Outreach program, though, continued their needle exchange, which has operated, unregulated, for 20 years from a parking lot near Barson and Bixby streets, in an area often frequented by drug users. Street Outreach secured help from the county and the use of a county van for mobile needle exchange.

Street Outreach Supporters told the Sentinel that drug users often ditch used needles if they spot police and fear arrest. Others lose needles as a consequence of being homeless, or because of impairment from their addictions.

Drug users contacted by the Sentinel for our report said they try to collect dirty syringes and put them in special containers for collection by the needle exchange workers. In addition, needle drop boxes public restrooms in Santa Cruz were vandalized or ripped off walls and are now gone. The two remaining drop boxes are at the Santa Cruz and Watsonville bus stations; both boxes are often full of syringes.

While we applaud the three council members — David Terrazas, Cynthia Mathews and Pamela Comstock — who want the city to work with county health officials to increase oversight of needle exchanges, we also hope this indicates Santa Cruz is coming to terms with the unintended consequences of helping addicts in the name of public health.

Sadly, drug addicts consumed by their ever-present and active disease, don’t often consider these consequences.

But, increasingly, the rest of the community does.

***

This post is the Sentinel Editorial for Jan. 31, 2013.

Photo by Dan Coyro/Sentinel

Posted in Crime, culture, education, Health, Local news, Opinion | View Comments

Panetta: Good and faithful public servant

The Jan. 23, Sentinel Editorial:

Jacquelyn Martin/Associated Press Defense Secretary Leon Panetta left 10 Downing Street, in London, Friday.

If this is the last public service job Leon Panetta decides to hold, then he deserves the thanks of the entire country.

For Monterey native Panetta, who represented Santa Cruz County in Congress for six terms, and later served as White House budget director and President Bill Clinton’s chief of staff, his latest tenure in government service is ending.

Asked by President Barack Obama to leave his comfortable life at home in the Carmel Valley and serving on a variety of boards, both corporate and public interest, Panetta said yes to coming back to Washington D.C. as director of the Central Intelligence Agency.

When Obama asked Panetta to take over from Robert Gates as the nation’s secretary of defense, Panetta stayed on.

Now, after four years of testifying before Congress, traveling around the world and presiding over overhauls at CIA and staving off draconian military budget cuts, Panetta, 74,  is ready to return home.

He completed his final overseas journey as defense secretary last weekend. His 19 months as chief of the world’s most powerful military were eventful, as he fought to protect the defense budget from billions of dollars in automatic spending cuts he warned would be akin to hacking with a “meat ax.” He also oversaw the final pullout  of U.S. forces from Iraq, the U.S. participation in the NATO campaign to bring down Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi and the drawdown of troops from Afghanistan.

For all that Panetta has accomplished in his rich and varied governmental career, though, he may go down in history for his role in tracking down Osama bin Laden.

You might recall that shortly after bin Laden was killed by a Navy SEALS team, Panetta was given a standing ovation by the House of Representatives as he arrived to give a closed-door briefing on the operation. Typically, he made a joke about it, saying people were applauding only because he had once been one of them. But news accounts later revealed how Panetta was briefed after taking over as CIA chief on the search for bin Laden — details that dovetail nicely with the new film, “Zero Dark Thirty,” where James Gandolfini plays the CIA director getting the briefing.

In February 2011, Panetta decided it was time to begin planning the operation; later he began holding daily meetings about the hunt — on April 19, 2011 he informed the president that the CIA believed it had located bin Laden. Panetta was by the president’s side on May 2, 2011, when the assault on the Abbottabad, Pakistan compound took place and the news finally came back that bin Laden had been found and killed.

Through it all, Panetta remained a man who enjoys people, an earthy and wise veteran of countless intrigues and political battles who likes the rough and tumble of negotiations and loves a good joke. A man of the people who loves the Central Coast, especially the Monterey Peninsula.

Panetta remains on the job. This week, he told reporters the Obama administration will continue to use drone strikes as part of its counter-terrorism efforts, despite controversy over their use, and that the operations will move to North Africa after the Algerian attack by Islamic militants.

But his time is winding down. Former Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel is Obama’s choice to replace him, though Hagel’s positions on Israel and the U.S. role in the Middle East have put him at odds with his own party prior to confirmation hearings.

We hope to see Panetta back soon at the public policy Panetta Institute he and his wife, Sylvia, founded at Cal State Monterey Bay. As he leaves government, all Americans can recognize that Leon Panetta has been a good and faithful public servant.

Posted in culture, Economy, History, Local news, National news, Opinion, Politics, The world | View Comments

DIY: My adventures in handyman-ination

The handyguys

 

I have found a way to make myself useful, for once. And like pretty much everything else these days, it replaces flesh and blood with a digital solution. Kind of.

As probably everyone under the age of 35 knows, just about any instruction these days is available online. For guitar teachers and yoga practitioners, their YouTube videos and websites can often bring in money through sponsorships or even sign-up fees.

But for more prosaic tasks, how-to information often is available for free. In the past couple of months, I’ve had ample opportunities to learn this.

In the first case, I had a 2009 MacBook laptop that simply couldn’t handle Apple’s new operating system with any speed or alacrity, not to mention a hard drive that iCloud or no iCloud, was jammed full of useful and useless files, old photos and my daughters’ music collections. When the laptop finally froze up completely, I took it into an Apple store Genius Bar and was told the cost of repairs would be more than the laptop was worth.

One solution was to buy a new laptop, which, considering the number of Apple devices — iPad, iPhone, kids’ laptops — already weighing me down, seemed a bit drastic, especially considering the $1500 or so it would set me back. So I went online and priced a new hard drive and more RAM. For less than $150, my dead laptop could rise again with more speed, memory and an ability to keep up with Apple’s endless upgrades to its IOS. But how to do it myself?

The answer was on a mobile app, ifixit. (You can also visit the website by the same name.) There, among hundreds of how-to manuals, was a series of photo step-by-step illustrations guiding me through both tasks, along with telling me what tools I needed.

It took me about an hour to install the new hard drive and memory. The laptop now is faster and more capable than my daughter’s 2011 MacBook.

But that was digital-to-digital transmission of knowledge. How ’bout something more prosaic? How about a toilet that wouldn’t stop running?

After a little online research, I found that most online plumbers were recommending Korky replacement parts as a surefire way to repair the particular model of toilet that was driving me crazy. So I trotted down to the hardware store, picked up the parts, went onto the Korky website, where a YouTube video presentation by a young woman took me step by step through the installation and repair process for a new fill valve and flapper. Half an hour later, the toilet was cured. A miracle.

Then came the Household Problem Whose Name Could Hardly Be Spoken — a three-year old Kenmore dishwasher that no longer cleaned dishes. We had tried changing detergents and rinse agents; nearly washing dishes before they went into the machine; ranting; raving — nothing worked. Glasses came out filmy, plates grimy. The chorus of complaints in my house became deafening. What to do?

Once again, an online search — this time using the phrase “Kenmore dishwasher doesn’t clean.” Sifting through the results I came upon a YouTube video from the “handyguyspodcast” — two self-professed ordinary househusbands with “honey-do” task lists, who also stress they are not appliance repairmen but who had, through revelation or research I know not, learned how to fix this horrifying problem and others.

Their sponsored YouTube video walked me through dismantling the insides of the dishwasher to get to the root of the problem: food and other debris that was blocking clean water from rinsing the dishes. Because of the clogging, dirty water was recirculating in the dishwasher, thus dishes couldn’t be cleaned.

With my iPad video playing, on my knees before the sullen appliance, I carefully followed the handyguys’ instructions — which, amazingly, were spot on, down to the difficulty in removing and cleaning a tiny rubber valve, to the nooks and crevices that needed to be cleaned out. Then they gave equally detailed video instructions how to put everything back.

The result? Yesterday, we ran a dishwasher cycle and for the first time in months, the dishes, including glassware, came out clean and spotless.

It was one of those all too fleeting moments of triumph and satisfaction that are a reminder of abundant life — a desire that usually remains unfulfilled.

The downside? Well, in all three cases — the laptop, the toilet and the dishwasher — by doing the work myself, I bypassed the service industries that employ folks who do just this kind of work. Considering the laptop repairs were estimated at $650, a plumber minimum would have run $150 plus parts and an appliance repair call could have been another $200 or so, I figure I saved about $850.

The cost to the local economy of taking on these repairs through the wonder of online manuals and DIY videos, I know not, but I have to figure if I’m learning how to do these tasks, countless other hapless and heretofore helpless men and women are doing the same.

Since I work in the newspaper industry, I also know that digital information and advertising is overwhelming our increasingly outmoded print delivery systems, which is why the Sentinel continues to direct resources, talent and effort toward online and mobile products.

Has this transformation cost innumerable jobs in my business? Of course. But I guess I wouldn’t turn the clock back if I could, because, once grasped, the power of the unleashed handyman is an awesome force — one that cleans dishes, repairs running toilets and brings dead computers back to life.

 

 

Posted in culture, Economy, In the spirit, technology | View Comments

Open and shut: the death of Aaron Swartz

Internet activist Aaron Swartz died Friday. (Michael Francis McElroy / Associated Press / January 30, 2009)

The suicide of digital open-access activist Aaron Swartz was a tragedy for his family and his friends. Swartz, who was 26 when he hung himself Friday, spent much of his short life deeply immersed in the online world. He had suffered from depression, according to those who knew him — and was particularly troubled because the federal government wanted to put him behind bars.

Swartz’s death has provoked a massive reaction online, especially on Twitter, where more than 30,000 tweets had been posted with the hashtag #pdftribute in honor of Swartz’s memory. Many of these tweets have links to academic researchers’ work — the very issue that got Swartz in legal trouble. In addition to Swartz, other advocates of “open access” to scholarly journals also want to see research papers opened to the public, rather than published only in journals, and requiring payment for anyone wanting to read the work.

Swartz, called a “hacker” by critics, had been an active critic of closed information — especially documents kept private by the federal government. He believed that if research was funded by taxpayers, it should then be open to anyone. Swartz was something of an Internet wunderkind, well known as one of the creators of Reddit and RSS, the technology behind blogs, podcasts and other web-based subscription services.

He was  obviously gifted and passionate about his core beliefs about the public’s untrammeled access to information. But his beliefs and activism ran up against the often confusing maze of copyright laws and the penalties for violating them.

In 2011, Swartz was charged with stealing nearly 5 million paywall-accessed articles from an MIT computer archive. His intention, according to prosecutors, was to distribute the articles for free on file sharing websites. Security cameras caught Swartz hacking into the university’s databases.His trial was set to begin in April, and he could have faced several years in prison. His family says prosecution of the case helped lead to Swartz’s suicide.

Strangely, Swartz himself had written in 2008 that while information sharing was a “moral imperative,” he also noted that the law had to be recognized on copyrighted information and that as far as “secret databases” were concerned, they should be paid for before being distributed freely.

And yet the felony charges brought against him by the Justice Department accused him of stealing material that took someone time and often money to create. Swartz himself sold Reddit and its intellectual property.

So, in the aftermath of Swartz’s suicide, there would seem to be two issues. One is the overwhelming force of the federal government coming down on individuals, depressed or not, over Internet activism and copyright infringement. Clearly, the government, which reportedly was offering a lesser sentence than the initial 35 years if Swartz would concede guilt, needs to consider just who is being protected in these cases and whether the threatened punishments are equal to the alleged crime. Moreover, the downloading of protected files has become commonplace in the digital age, if not to the extent practiced by Swartz.

But open-access advocates need to acknowledge that breaking into a university network to illegally download thousands of files is an illegal action — and breaking the law has consequences. Copyright law may be a muddled maze, but without it, the concept of intellectual property becomes meaningless.

If nothing else, Swartz’s death should provoke a discussion involving academics, government officials, prosecutors and activists over finding a balance between the public’s right to information and intellectual property rights. Hopefully, this discussion might open doors rather than close them even further.

Posted in Crime, culture, Economy, National news, Opinion, technology | View Comments